the foreign embassy
Now Playing
Read Me
The Fatal Shore, by Robert Hughes
Underworld, by Dom DeLillo
The Hero With A Thousand Faces by Joseph Campbell
Arcadia, by Tom Stoppard
The Elements of Style, Fourth Edition, by William Strunk, Jr., E.B. White
Y: The Last Man, by Brian Vaughan, Pia Guerra
Reverse Shot
Steven Soderbergh: Interviews, by Anthony Kaufman
Enjoyments
JC Superstar
spookybear's Xanga Site
My Big Brother Bill
Airbag
kottke.org
dooce
Die Puny Humans
effinchamp
VersionTracker
Recent Entries
Signs of Life
The Tattooed Man
These Days
Lessons Learned from Life on the Road
On the Road...
Lost in Transition
This New House
This Must Be The Place
The General Orders a Pizza
"Young JEEEZUSS!"
Highlights
Zen and the Art of iBook Repair
Dark
Breakdown, Go Ahead and Give It To Me
The Forensic Engineer
This is the Story of Bernard and Bernice
Half-Hour Fiction
Archives
June 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
Search


Syndicate this site (XML)


valid-xhtml10.png

movabletype


random header

Mates

Peter Weir's GALLIPOLI was on cable the other night. I watched, because whenever Peter Weir's on, I watch. The man's a master.

Anyway, all I could hear, as I watched, was the voice in my head of a professor I had in an Introduction to Australian Film class I attended while studying at the University of New South Wales in Sydney. "Don't be distracted," the professor said, in his heavy German accent, "by the film's overt context, which is Australia's involvement in the First World War. What we're interested in, here, is the subtext." Or words to that effect.

The subtext, for those unfortunate of you who haven't seen GALLIPOLI, or weren't paying attention, is the uniquely Australian concept of friendship. That is, the concept of mates. A mate is the friend that you stand behind, and who stands behind you, come hell or high water. The guy who's got your back, in a nutshell. It reeks of machismo, and it's difficult to describe without sounding like a fratboy or a deeply-closeted homosexual, but if you've got it, you know it: the friend you can call in the middle of the night, half a continent away, and ask for help, knowing with certainty that you'll get it, that he'll be in his car before the sun comes up. The friend you can see after a year of absence without missing a beat, picking up the conversation right where you left off. You can be in a pub single-handedly challenging the entire Sydney National Rugby squad to a drag-down brawl, and your mate will be standing behind you, maybe not liking the idea so much, but standing there nonetheless.

You don't hear much about mates. You hear about "friends," about "buddies" and such, but it's really not the same. Mates are a rare thing, and when you've got them, you've got them for good. That kind of loyalty's a hard thing to come by in these times...it's too much work. Casual friendship is easy. Casual friendship is safe. You can walk away from casual friends without much of an effort, without sparing so much as a glance behind. Mates, on the other hand, are hard. Honestly, mates can be a pain in the ass, and they can get you into a world of hurt. But in the end, they're the ones who are worth it.

I've got mates. I don't see them nearly often enough, but it's enough to know I've got 'em. You can judge a man by his friends, by his mates, and I'll be happy enough being judged by mine. And I'd go to the wall for them. Because, really, what the hell else is worth going to the wall for, if not your mates?

I turn into a real sentimental sonofagun after a couple of pints of Guinness.

Posted by eric k at January 10, 2004 02:24 AM
Comments

That's probably what's up with the hobbits. I thought they were pretty gay too, but maybe that's discrimination against mates...

Posted by: ari on January 12, 2004 10:18 AM

Good point. The hobbits were total mates, pledging eternal friendship and loyalty and all that. But close friendships of the same sex seemingly have to be equated with homosexuality nowadays, and the idea of mates has gone the way of the dodo. Oh, well.

Posted by: eric k on January 12, 2004 10:18 PM

By George, I think he got it! Well done!

Posted by: the old man on January 16, 2004 10:51 PM
Post a comment